We now expect analytics in all of our marketing (thank you, Internet)
When people think of analytics in marketing, they think of online marketing. They think of things like PPC and SEO, measuring clicks, tracking pixels, conversion funnels and so on. They think of direct acquisition campaigns and CRM activities.
And it’s sensible to equate marketing analytics with online marketing. Online marketing has changed the culture of marketing in general by providing unprecedented levels of data and automation. It has changed expectations. Marketing should be measured and optimized. Its spend should be justified with numbers.
However, analytics in brand marketing is hard
Where this cultural revolution runs into problems is with brand marketing. Brand marketing is traditionally based around non-online media (such as TV and print). This makes it much harder to granularly track its impact. How many of your target customers were affected by that ad that ran on the bottom half of page 5 of the newspaper? And a lot of brand marketing is not directly linked to an immediate purchase by the customer, so it’s harder to know confidently whether it has yielded a return.
It is a strange juxtaposition at a company when the marketer managing Facebook ads can measure down to the penny the return from 1k of spend, while the brand manager might struggle to prove any impact from 1 million of spend. This contrast isn’t helped by the tendency for the most analytical minds to steer away from brand marketing and towards online. But the exact opposite should happen.
Hard problems need good people
Brand marketing deserves some of the most analytical talent that a marketing organization can throw at it. Why?
First of all, the budgets for brand marketing tend to be big and chunky. And they can be spent fast. Media buys and creative production can chew through a seven figure budget in the blink of an eye. Compared to online acquisition or CRM campaigns, where spend can be drip fed and paced, brand marketing is high risk.
Secondly, the analytics for brand marketing are just much harder. Analyzing online marketing is a straightforward: lots of data, lots of tools, narrowly-defined problems. In brand marketing, your data is much sparser. It comes from many sources. Those sources aren’t automated. In fact, one of the key sources is probably a survey, which needs time and money to be run. And to reach a conclusion, you need sharp minds to triangulate rigorously across your data sets.
Brand marketing might be evolving, but some things stay the same
“But wait! People are consuming Youtube and banner ads. Not terrestrial TV and print. We can measure our heart out and automatically suck up data, just like a Google PPC ad.”
Sure, but it’s only partially true. The old mediums, like print, aren’t going to suddenly die. And until we can perfectly track people seeing a billboard, listening to a radio ad and reading a PR piece – and then link them to their purchase 1 year later – the need for sophisticated analytical talent won’t go away.
So for at least the years to come, it won’t be easy. And this is exactly why brand marketing needs the best analytical talent your organization can give to it.
GS Dun builds new ventures and products, such as CakeAB, the easy-to-use pocket calculator for AB tests. Our name is short for “get sh** done”, so while we can talk the talk, we prefer to keep our meetings short and just get on with it.

